A critical analysis of human improvement projects from the perspective of the self-organization theory
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17648/2175-2834-v22n1-430Abstract
Based on the theory of self-organization, the objective of this paper is tocritically discuss the theses defended by the postulators of two projects that aim toimprove human nature: eugenics and transhumanism. We will try to show that the“science of eugenics”, proposed by Francis Galton (1883), and the contemporarytranshumanist project, outlined since the second half of the 20th century, share thecontroversial belief that human beings, through science and technology, are able tosuccessfully control the evolutionary processes of human species. We will try to showthat this belief disregards the central characteristics of the complex self-organizedadaptive evolutionary processes of organisms in general. For this purpose, we willcritically analyse the central theses of the transhumanist project and the “status quo bias”argument proposed by Bolton and Ord (2006) in defence of such theses. We conclude byemphasizing that the proponents of the contemporary transhumanist project would benefitfrom a fallibilistic perspective that would allow them to face the project's social andethical possible implications with epistemic prudence.Downloads
Published
2020-07-03
How to Cite
C. Broens, M. (2020). A critical analysis of human improvement projects from the perspective of the self-organization theory. Human Nature - International Philosophy and Psychology Review, 22(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.17648/2175-2834-v22n1-430
Issue
Section
Dossiê