The indeterminacy character of anguish in human formation

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59539/2175-2834-v27n2-813

Keywords:

anguish; Heidegger; indeterminacy; human formation.

Abstract

In this article, the phenomenon of anguish is discussed in its nature of indeterminacy, having as its central reference the philosophical scope of Martin Heidegger, in addition to other classic and contemporary interfaces, such as psychoanalysis. The proposal is to elaborate the correspondence of this indeterminacy as a fundamental mark of human formation. Methodologically, a hermeneutic phenomenology operates in qualitative bibliographic research. In view of this, the character of indeterminacy is taken from a fundamental affective tone in the structural constitution of what is in force in human formation: in Heideggerian terms, the formation of human being there. Therefore, an ontological tone. Based on this overlap, what would be the contribution to thinking about training? A clue to the question: we seek to show that the indication of the indeterminacy of the object of anguish has repercussions on the object of human formation, prevailing in being there a greater orientation that is fundamental to it, namely: the indeterminacy of being. Therefore, human formation comes from this foundation of indeterminacy.

Author Biographies

Israel Mannes, Secretaria Estadual de Educação de Santa Catarina; Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFCS)

Dr. and Master in Education (UFSC), in the Philosophy of Education research line. Specialization in Philosophy (UFSC). Degree in Philosophy (UFSC). Effective professor of Philosophy at the Santa Catarina State Education Network. ORCID iD: https://orcid.org//0000-0001-9295-9187

Rosana Silva de Moura, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)

Professora Associada da Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC).

Published

2025-08-29 — Updated on 2025-08-29

How to Cite

Mannes, I., & Moura, R. S. de. (2025). The indeterminacy character of anguish in human formation. Human Nature - International Philosophy and Psychology Review, 27(1), 166–190. https://doi.org/10.59539/2175-2834-v27n2-813