False self and borderline pathology in Winnicott's thinking: historical background and subsequent developments

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59539/2175-2834-v12n2-1156

Keywords:

false self; borderline pathology; Fairbairn; Deutsch; Winnicott.

Abstract

This article investigates the theoretical background of Winnicott's concepts of false self and borderline pathology in the history of psychoanalysis (reaching Ferenczi, Faribairn and H. Deutsch). Afterwards, it describes Winnicott's formulations of those concepts, pointing out their inconclusiveness. Finally, it makes an effort to develop those concepts, following Winnicott's steps and clinical evidences.

Published

2010-10-02

How to Cite

Naffah Neto, A. (2010). False self and borderline pathology in Winnicott’s thinking: historical background and subsequent developments. Human Nature - International Philosophy and Psychology Review, 12(2), 77–95. https://doi.org/10.59539/2175-2834-v12n2-1156