False self and borderline pathology in Winnicott's thinking: historical background and subsequent developments
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59539/2175-2834-v12n2-1156Keywords:
false self; borderline pathology; Fairbairn; Deutsch; Winnicott.Abstract
This article investigates the theoretical background of Winnicott's concepts of false self and borderline pathology in the history of psychoanalysis (reaching Ferenczi, Faribairn and H. Deutsch). Afterwards, it describes Winnicott's formulations of those concepts, pointing out their inconclusiveness. Finally, it makes an effort to develop those concepts, following Winnicott's steps and clinical evidences.Downloads
Published
2010-10-02
How to Cite
Naffah Neto, A. (2010). False self and borderline pathology in Winnicott’s thinking: historical background and subsequent developments. Human Nature - International Philosophy and Psychology Review, 12(2), 77–95. https://doi.org/10.59539/2175-2834-v12n2-1156
Issue
Section
Artigos