Winnicott and the Middle Group: the difference that makes a diferrence

Authors

  • Ariadne Alvarenga de Rezende Engelberg de Moraes

Abstract

Based on the concept that the foundation of the Middle Group of British is a theoretical dissidence of the classic psychoanalytic propositions, I emphasizes the central ideas of the British theorists of the object relations theory, showing their disagreements with Klein, author who, although was a pioneer in the development of the object relations concept, was the main defender of the traditional thinking. After that, I analyze the winnicottian notions of self constitution and achievement of concern as well as the theoretical pillars which distinguish Winnicott originality with regard to the development of the psychoanalytic theory and in respect to the Middle Group. I do that based on the idea that, for Winnicott, the constitution of a sense of self is the main condition to the achievement of the ability to enter in relationship with and the achievement of concern, a condition necessary for the acquisition of abilities such as to trust in, to have personal and interpersonal freedom, to be responsible for. Keywords: Winnicott, Middle Group, Object relations, Sense of self, Psychoanalysis.

Published

2024-10-02

How to Cite

Alvarenga de Rezende Engelberg de Moraes, A. (2024). Winnicott and the Middle Group: the difference that makes a diferrence. Human Nature - International Philosophy and Psychology Review, 10(1), 73–104. Retrieved from https://revistas.dwwe.com.br:443/index.php/NH/article/view/923